lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Dec]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] param: Adapt MN10300 to the new parameter handling regime
Date
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:

> > > It should, perhaps,
> > > appear in /proc/cmdline, but for some reason it does not.
> >
> > Hmm, that's more concering. I'll dig into this in the morning.
>
> OK, I can't reproduce it. I was thinking some weird corner case
> with not restoring the string in parse_args, but putting in a dummy
> "mem" core_param() on x86 works as first, middle and last arg on cmdline,
> and command line shows up correctly in /proc/cmdline.
>
> Any chance I can ask you to verify that? Is the commandline printk'd
> on boot also wrong?

I think I must've tested it wrong, probably by forgetting to paste in a mem=
option on the kernel command line when I was trying to check /proc/cmdline.
Leastways, it works now.

David


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-12-10 11:41    [W:0.058 / U:0.584 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site