Messages in this thread | | | From | David Howells <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/3] param: Adapt MN10300 to the new parameter handling regime | Date | Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:39:31 +0000 |
| |
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> > > It should, perhaps, > > > appear in /proc/cmdline, but for some reason it does not. > > > > Hmm, that's more concering. I'll dig into this in the morning. > > OK, I can't reproduce it. I was thinking some weird corner case > with not restoring the string in parse_args, but putting in a dummy > "mem" core_param() on x86 works as first, middle and last arg on cmdline, > and command line shows up correctly in /proc/cmdline. > > Any chance I can ask you to verify that? Is the commandline printk'd > on boot also wrong?
I think I must've tested it wrong, probably by forgetting to paste in a mem= option on the kernel command line when I was trying to check /proc/cmdline. Leastways, it works now.
David
| |