lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Nov]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ALSA: have snd_BUG_ON() always refer to arguments
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 03:03, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Fri, 7 Nov 2008 02:57:40 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 02:38, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>> > At Fri, 7 Nov 2008 02:29:25 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> >> it also breaks
>> >> valid C code if there were side effects in the (cond) as any other
>> >> macro which does not properly utilize every argument exactly once.
>> >
>> > BTW, what do you mean this exactly?
>>
>> any potent statement. such as assignment or pre/post increment/decrement or ...
>
> Well, in that case, such a code itself is buggy :)

i'm not advocating doing this sort of thing, i'm saying that
functions/macros should be written correctly so as to not break
standard C behavior. a guy developing a codec driver could waste a
lot of time because of this sort of thing.
-mike


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-11-07 09:09    [W:0.074 / U:0.176 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site