[lkml]   [2008]   [Nov]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/16 v6] PCI: Linux kernel SR-IOV support
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 04:38:40PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >It's not clear thats the right solution. If the VF devices are _only_
> >going to be used by the guest, then arguably, we don't want to create
> >pci_devs for them in the host. (I think it _is_ the right answer, but I
> >want to make it clear there's multiple opinions on this).
> The VFs shouldn't be limited to being used by the guest.
> SR-IOV is actually an incredibly painful thing. You need to have a VF
> driver in the guest, do hardware pass through, have a PV driver stub in
> the guest that's hypervisor specific (a VF is not usable on it's own),
> have a device specific backend in the VMM, and if you want to do live
> migration, have another PV driver in the guest that you can do teaming
> with. Just a mess.

Not to mention that you basically have to statically allocate them up

> What we would rather do in KVM, is have the VFs appear in the host as
> standard network devices. We would then like to back our existing PV
> driver to this VF directly bypassing the host networking stack. A key
> feature here is being able to fill the VF's receive queue with guest
> memory instead of host kernel memory so that you can get zero-copy
> receive traffic. This will perform just as well as doing passthrough
> (at least) and avoid all that ugliness of dealing with SR-IOV in the guest.

This argues for ignoring the SR-IOV mess completely. Just have the
host driver expose multiple 'ethN' devices.

> This eliminates all of the mess of various drivers in the guest and all
> the associated baggage of doing hardware passthrough.
> So IMHO, having VFs be usable in the host is absolutely critical because
> I think it's the only reasonable usage model.
> Regards,
> Anthony Liguori
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to
> More majordomo info at

Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-11-07 00:01    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean