lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Nov]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [linux-pm] [PATCH] hibernation should work ok with memory hotplug
From
Date
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 18:30 +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> One other question, if I may. Would you please explain (or point me to
> an explanation) of PHYS_PFN_OFFSET/ARCH_PFN_OFFSET? I've been dealing
> occasionally with people wanting to have hibernation on arm, and I don't
> really get the concept or the implementation (particularly when it comes
> to trying to do the sort of iterating over zones and pfns that was being
> discussed in previous messages in this thread.

First of all, I think PHYS_PFN_OFFSET is truly an arch-dependent
construct. It only appears in arm an avr32. I'll tell you only how
ARCH_PFN_OFFSET looks to me. My guess is that those two arches need to
reconcile themselves and start using ARCH_PFN_OFFSET instead.

In the old days, we only had memory that started at physical address 0x0
and went up to some larger address. We allocated a mem_map[] of 'struct
pages' in one big chunk, one for each address. mem_map[0] was for
physical address 0x0 and mem_map[1] was for 0x1000, mem_map[2] was for
0x2000 and so on...

If a machine didn't have a physical address 0x0, we allocated mem_map[]
for it anyway and just wasted that entry. What ARCH_PFN_OFFSET does is
let us bias the mem_map[] structure so that mem_map[0] does not
represent 0x0.

If ARCH_PFN_OFFSET is 1, then mem_map[0] actually represents the
physical address 0x1000. If it is 2, then mem_map[0] represents
physical addr 0x2000. ARCH_PFN_OFFSET means that the first physical
address on the machine is at ARCH_PFN_OFFSET*PAGE_SIZE. We bias all
lookups into the mem_map[] so that we don't waste space in it. There
will never be a zone_start_pfn lower than ARCH_PFN_OFFSET, for instance.

What does that mean for walking zones? Nothing. It only has meaning
for how we allocate and do lookups into the mem_map[]. But, since
everyone uses pfn_to_page() and friends, you don't ever see this.

I'm curious why you think you need to be concerned with it.

-- Dave



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-11-04 08:57    [W:0.061 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site