Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 4 Nov 2008 18:35:24 +0100 | From | Jörn Engel <> | Subject | Re: arm checkstack |
| |
On Tue, 4 November 2008 17:06:28 +0100, Matthieu CASTET wrote: > > I wonder why the arm version of checkstack only catch stack size >= 300 > and < 10000 [1]. > Why doesn't it use ".*sub.*sp, sp, #([0-9]{1,8})" to catch all stack usage ?
Looks like a bug. And it further looks like Holger just copied what everyone else did at the time. And the one who started this strange pattern was: Arnd.
Arnd, did you have a good reason for choosing the pattern?
> [1] > $re = qr/.*sub.*sp, sp, #(([0-9]{2}|[3-9])[0-9]{2})/o;
Jörn
-- The cost of changing business rules is much more expensive for software than for a secretaty. -- unknown -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |