Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Tue, 4 Nov 2008 15:25:51 +0900 | | From | KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <> | | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] memcg : force_empty to do move account |
| |
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 22:23:11 -0800 Paul Menage <menage@google.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:17 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki > <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > mem = memcg; > >> > - ret = mem_cgroup_try_charge(mm, gfp_mask, &mem); > >> > + ret = __mem_cgroup_try_charge(mm, gfp_mask, &mem, true); > >> > >> Isn't this the same as the definition of mem_cgroup_try_charge()? So > >> you could leave it as-is? > >> > > try_charge is called by other places....swapin. > > > > No, I mean here you can call mem_cgroup_try_charge(...) rather than > __mem_cgroup_try_charge(..., true). >
you're right. will remove this change.
Thanks, -Kame
|  |