Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Mon, 3 Nov 2008 22:23:11 -0800 | | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] memcg : force_empty to do move account | | From | Paul Menage <> | |
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:17 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > mem = memcg;
>> > - ret = mem_cgroup_try_charge(mm, gfp_mask, &mem);
>> > + ret = __mem_cgroup_try_charge(mm, gfp_mask, &mem, true);
>>
>> Isn't this the same as the definition of mem_cgroup_try_charge()? So
>> you could leave it as-is?
>>
> try_charge is called by other places....swapin.
>
No, I mean here you can call mem_cgroup_try_charge(...) rather than
__mem_cgroup_try_charge(..., true).
Paul
|  |