lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Nov]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [patch 0/3] [RFC] kernel/glibc mismatch of "readlink" syscall?
From
Daniel,

Daniel Gollub wrote:
> On Friday 31 October 2008 16:02:48 Kai Henningsen wrote:
>> Am Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:53:25 -0500
>>
>> schrieb "Michael Kerrisk" <mtk.manpages@googlemail.com>:
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Daniel Gollub <dgollub@suse.de>
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>> EINVAL bufsiz is not positive.
>>> The EINVAL error was added to man-pages-1.18 in 1997 (even though, as
>>> you note, the type was "size_t"). I suspect (this was well before I
>>> had any association with man-pages) that was done to reflect kernel
>>> reality (since one could bypass glibc invoke the syscall directly),
>>> but obviously it is inconsistent with the prototype.
>> Actually, it's not inconsistent as described, though perhaps that is
>> unintentional. "Not positive" isn't the same as "negative", as zero
>> isn't positive either, and zero is certainly a possible value of an
>> unsigned type
>
> True.

So, at this stage I don't plan to make any change to man-pages.
(Let me know if you think this is the wrong course.)

> But there is still the problem for the ltp syscall test "readlink03", when
> using the glibc "readlink" interface, by calling readlink with a buffer size
> of "-1".
>
> Calling "-1" seems to be a valid code/error-path in the linux syscall
> "readlink", since there is a check for less-equal zero.
>
> But the less zero, condition can't be reached via the glibc "readlink"
> interface since this would cause fortify-check to fail (when buliding with -
> D_FORITFY_SOURCE=2).
>
> To "workaround" the fortify check, by not compiling the testcase with -
> D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2, or trying to test the linux readlink interface by calling
> directly syscall() in the testcase ... both suggestion are just workarounds -
> no real solutions.
>
> We could also just remove the testcase of buffer size "-1".
>
> The problem is still, how to test the "readlink" syscall in LTP?

I'd say: remove this test. And add one for bufsiz==0 if there isn't one
already.

--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/docs/man-pages/man-pages.git
man-pages online: http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online_pages.html
Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-11-04 17:23    [W:0.141 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site