lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Nov]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] sched: Don't allow priority switch to realtime when the task doesn't belong to init_task_group and when CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED isn't set
From
Date
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 09:28 +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 02:11:16AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 11:48 +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> > > Applies on 2.6.28-rc5.
> > >
> > > With CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED not set, don't allow a task's priority switch
> > > to realtime if the task isn't part of init_task_group.
> > >
> > > A task belonging to a fair group could use sched_setscheduler/sched_setparam
> > > to become a realtime task. If such a task belongs to one of the
> > > child groups of init_task_group and if CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED is not set,
> > > then it ends up getting queued in init_task_group's runqueue.
> > > So we have a situation where, a task belongs to one group (child)
> > > but ends in the runqueue of another group (init_task_group).
> > > This does not look correct.
> > >
> > > Fix this by failing such priority change requests in sched_setscheduler()
> > > and sched_setparam().
> >
> > NAK
> >
> > !RT_GROUP means the RT tasks should be fully invariant to any grouping
> > configuration. This patch breaks that.
> >
> > Furthermore your justification for this is plain wrong, you write as if
> > an RT tasks can belong to any grouping (in the !RT_GROUP case), by the
>
> Hmm... but that's I the impression I got when I started an RT
> task in a subgroup and saw it listed in the tasks list of the cgroup.
> So if RT tasks don't care about grouping (!RT_GROUP_SCHED), may be then
> such tasks shoudn't be shown in the cgroup tasks list.

Sure, do as you like upon the cgroup interface

> And may be as Ingo
> suggested they should be moved to init_task_group.

Bzzt, wrong! They should not be moved to any group, they cannot be moved
to any group, as they are group invariant.

> Without that it makes one
> think that a task is contributing to the cpu time of a group in which
> it was started, but it in reality it is not.

Until one thinks more and realizes RT tasks don't contribute anything to
groups as they are not part of them.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-11-24 09:35    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site