Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:22:31 -0700 | From | Pete Zaitcev <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: rr tree build failure |
| |
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:41:32 -0800, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> wrote:
> > > > This reverts to the 2005 (pre- aafbf24a) behaviour where "nousb" was > > > > not a module parameter, just a kernel command line parameter. That's > > > > more sensible anyway.
By the way, I floated the idea to remove "nousb" altogether on fedora-devel. Alan Cox replied that he has an actual box that requires it, because of a bug in SMM BIOS... Imagine my surprise. I think we're stuck with "nousb" for a little while still.
-- Pete
| |