Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:07:50 +0900 | | From | Tejun Heo <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCHSET] FUSE: extend FUSE to support more operations, take #2 | |
Hello, Miklos.
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Hi Tejun,
>
> On Thu, 20 Nov 2008, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> This patchset is the second take of extend-FUSE patchset. Changes
>> from the last take[L] are...
>
> I managed to review and apply this and the libfuse patches up to the
> ioctl support. After swithing _IOC_READ with _IOC_WRITE in the kernel
> the example program actually worked :)
Did I get that wrong? Looking at it again.... oops. It's reverse
alright. Thanks for catching it.
> I removed ->unrestricted_ioctl() and associated code because it really
> doesn't make any sense: the high level lib won't be used for CUSE
> stuff, otherwise unrestrited ioctls are not allowed (and the interface
> is rather horrible anyway).
Well, CUSE highlevel interface piggy backs on FUSE so it requires
unrestricted_ioctl() there for it and ossp does use it.
> The poll patches look OK at a first glance too, I'll review them
> tomorrow.
Alright, thanks.
--
tejun
|  |