Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:19:19 +0100 | From | Bernd Schubert <> | Subject | cache flush timeouts by blk_queue_ordered() |
| |
Hello,
with some FC hardware-raid units we have the problem that the SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE command reproducibly fails.
[658715.827428] sd 6:0:2:2: last recovery: 4311805647, now: 4459793681 [658715.833980] sd 6:0:2:2: [sdk] Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_OK,SUGGEST_OK [658715.842288] sd 6:0:2:2: [sdk] CDB: Synchronize Cache(10): 35 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 [658715.850954] sd 6:0:2:2: Activating scsi error recovery (1) [658715.856793] sd 6:0:2:2: trying to abort command [658715.861820] qla2xxx 0000:07:02.0: scsi(6:2:2): Abort command issued -- 1 36e2df2 2002. [658746.004124] sd 6:0:2:2: last recovery: 4459793692, now: 4459801236 [658746.010686] sd 6:0:2:2: [sdk] Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_OK,SUGGEST_OK [658746.019004] sd 6:0:2:2: [sdk] CDB: Synchronize Cache(10): 35 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 [658746.027680] sd 6:0:2:2: Activating scsi error recovery (2) [658746.033526] sd 6:0:2:2: trying to abort command [658746.038543] qla2xxx 0000:07:02.0: scsi(6:2:2): Abort command issued -- 1 36e2df4 2002.
My guess is that these units flush their cache when this command is send even though they have a battery backup unit and flushing 2GB cache may take some time... Since I can only reproduce it on systems in production I can't do any experiments, but I guess the default timeout of 30s is not sufficient.
Problem is now that this timeout cannot be adjusted by the sysfs scsi device timeout, since sd_prepare_flush() doesn't have the required device structure. The reason for that is blk_queue_ordered(). It neither gets a timeout argument, nor any pointer to the device.
I already tried to use container_of() in sd_prepare_flush, but somehow that doesn't seem work if the structure member is a pointer.
The next solution that comes into my my mind is to add the timeout argument to blk_queue_ordered() and subsequentely to modifiy all callers. Would such a patch be accepted? Or is there any better solution?
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks, Bernd
PS: (I'm also discussing the cache flush issue with one of our hardware vendors, but fixing their firmware might take ages).
| |