[lkml]   [2008]   [Nov]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] tracing/function-return-tracer: add the overrun field
2008/11/18 Steven Rostedt <>:
> How about a compromise, start off the patch series getting it working with
> task struct static array, and then finish the series with the dynamic
> array.
> This is my development model, because it lets me know where the bugs are
> better. If we find some strange bug, this can help pin point via a bisect
> if the bug is with the general code, or with the use of a dynamic array.
> Just my preference ;-)

Ooh. I first agreed with Ingo's arguments about the fact that distros
can enable it whithout worrying.
But as I read your message, I guess that would be better to start with
static arrays to better find the bugs,
state by state...

Ingo, what do you think?

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-11-18 18:03    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans