Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 15 Nov 2008 10:34:24 +0000 | From | Alan Cox <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.27.6 question: ata_sff_hsm_move: ata15 (why always ata15)? |
| |
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:22:58 -0600 Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca> wrote:
> Justin Piszcz wrote: > > I am trying to find out what the root cause of this error/problem is: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462425 > > The problem is that people assume that timeouts with DRDY like that bug > refers to must be the same problem when it is often not
The first stopping point is to apply the DRQ drain patch I sent to the list some time ago and is hopefully lined up for 2.6.29. After that point you can begin to look at the remaining cases, until then its hardly worth it.
Alan
| |