Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 14 Nov 2008 23:10:32 +0300 | From | Sergei Shtylyov <> | Subject | Re: [GIT PATCH] USB patches for 2.6-git |
| |
Greg KH wrote:
>>>>There is a difference in the musb patch I submitted and the one which >>>>actually has been >>>>forwarded to you by Felipe. This difference has introduced a bug.
>>>>The patch in you series is, >>>>usb: musb: fix BULK request on different available endpoints
>>>>It was submitted by me at, >>>>http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=122337227617797&w=2
>>>>And the one which is forwarded to you by Felipe is at, >>>>http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=122528597316728&w=2
>>>>There is a difference in between above two as below. >>>>Original: + if (best_end < 0 && qh->type == USB_ENDPOINT_XFER_BULK) { >>>>Sent to you: + if (best_end > 0 && qh->type == USB_ENDPOINT_XFER_BULK) {
>>>>It should be [best_end < 0].
>>>>If it is possible then please correct this mismatch in your series.
>>>I'll wait to get a patch from Felipe for this.
>> I'm seeing it being to you sent at least a week ago -- look for "usb: >>musb: fix bug in musb_schedule".
> As Felipe is the maintainer of the musb code, and has been batching up > patches and sending them on to me when needed, I have only been taking > them from him.
> So that message is long deleted from my mail, sorry.
Even though it was a message from him CCing you? :-) Here it is: http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=122605639520312.
> thanks, > greg k-h
WBR, Sergei
| |