Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:16:25 +0100 (CET) | From | Geert Uytterhoeven <> | Subject | Re: Can you add the staging tree to -next? |
| |
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:42:48 +0100 (CET) Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > > > Apart from the patches you receive against -next, is there any other > > advantage, giving staging is disabled? > > Others compile linux-next with all sorts of configs, so we hopefully will > see any build failures. In fact, Greg might even built it with staging > enabled :-) > > We will also see any merge conflicts (though there probably won't be > many). > > I may also see if I can arrange for a build in each architecture with > staging enabled in my infrastructure here, but it may take a little while.
I build them for m68k anyway, but due to timezone differences, you usually find (and sometimes even fix ;-) the problems long before I notice them.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
| |