Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:33:12 -0700 | From | Grant Grundler <> | Subject | Re: sharing interrupt between PCI device |
| |
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 08:58:27AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org> wrote: > > > [+ingo - question for you about disable_irq() below] > > > The same problem exists with disable_irq() : only takes a global > > IRQ# and no additional identifying information to prevent disabling > > a shared IRQ. So I'm not sure if this is a bug with ACPI or design > > flaw in generic IRQ APIs. Ingo? > > that's how disable_irq() always worked: it disables all handlers on > that IRQ#. If the IRQ# is shared, it disables all handlers.
Ingo, Sorry - my question really was: given the above, should pcibios_disable_device() be calling pcibios_disable_irq()?
Right now, I think not.
thanks, grant
> > Ingo > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| |