[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    Patch in this message
    SubjectRe: splice vs O_APPEND
    On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > And it turns out that handling O_APPEND is actually pretty easy, so
    > instead of doing -EINVAL, we can just implement it. Something like this
    > (untested, of course).
    > Does this look better?

    Yeah, only the append is now racy because the O_APPEND check is
    outside i_mutex. So maybe just stick with -EINVAL in
    do_splice_from()? That also covers do_splice_direct(), which is used
    in NFS and sendfile() and a couple of other places.

    We know that nobody is currently relying on O_APPEND semantics with
    splice, so this should be OK.

    Untested patch...


    Index: linux-2.6/fs/splice.c
    --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/splice.c 2008-08-29 14:39:20.000000000 +0200
    +++ linux-2.6/fs/splice.c 2008-10-09 18:19:25.000000000 +0200
    @@ -892,6 +892,9 @@ static long do_splice_from(struct pipe_i
    int ret;

    + if (out->f_flags & O_APPEND)
    + return -EINVAL;
    if (unlikely(!out->f_op || !out->f_op->splice_write))
    return -EINVAL;

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-10-09 18:33    [W:0.020 / U:13.348 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site