![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 23:30:51 -0400 (EDT > The point is that many fsync()s may run in parallel and you have just > one inode and just one chain. And if you add two-word list_head to a > page, to link it on this list, many developers will hate it for > increasing its size. why to a page? a list head in the inode and chain up the bios.... or not make an actual list but just a "is the previous one done" thing it's not all that hard to get something that works on a per inode basis, that gives "wait for all io upto this one". -- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-10-06 06:23 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||