[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3] integrity: Linux Integrity Module(LIM)
    On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 09:40 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: 
    > On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 13:17 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
    > > Concern was raised on the lkml mailing list, about adding i_integrity
    > > to the inode structure. This patch adds a comment clarifying that
    > > i_integrity is only included in the inode if INTEGRITY is configured.
    > Mimi, it is nice that you made this a config option. That definitely
    > helps the embedded folks and those compiling their own kernels. But, it
    > doesn't really help those who run distros.
    > The distributions basically ship one kernel for everybody, and it has to
    > have CONFIG_KITCHEN_SINK=y in order to support everyone's individual
    > users. Although you provided a config option, in practice, this always
    > bloats distro kernels which are the vast majority of users.

    Thank you for giving a more fuller explanation as to why extending the
    inode is such an issue.

    > Is this even useful for filesystems like proc or sysfs? Should we bloat
    > those inodes for a feature which might not possibly apply there?

    Currently, we're not measuring proc or sysfs files.


     \ /
      Last update: 2008-10-31 20:37    [W:0.023 / U:2.704 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site