Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:46:35 +0100 | From | Heiko Carstens <> | Subject | Re: s390: struct device - replace bus_id with dev_name(), dev_set_name() |
| |
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 03:58:21PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 12:38, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:32:00AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > >> On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 01:57:07 +0100, > >> Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> wrote: > >> > >> > From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> > >> > Subject: s390: struct device - replace bus_id with dev_name(), dev_set_name() > >> > > >> > Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> > >> > Cc: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> > >> > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> > >> > Signed-Off-By: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> > >> > >> Other than the fact that this patch is a bit mis-named (it just gets > >> rid of BUS_ID_SIZE), this looks fine to me. > > Yeah, sorry, it's one of the 49 patches, where the subjects isn't > right, because you did the conversion already. :) > > > Who is supposed to send this upstream and when? > > Would be fine if it goes through the s390 tree, and gets merged there > soon so it shows up in -next.
Just to get this right: it doesn't depend on any other patches and is fine as a standalone patch, right? Sorry, this isn't obvious for me ;)
| |