Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:40:14 -0400 | | From | Theodore Tso <> | | Subject | Re: potential regression in ext[34] call to __page_symlink()? |
| |
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 04:25:57AM +0100, Nick Piggin wrote: > > I was leaning towards adding a new AOP_FLAG_ there, usable just by > filesystem code, and just to tell any helper code to clear __GFP_FS. > That way callers won't get confused into thinking they can do > GFP_ATOMIC writes from interrupt context or something ;) (which, > trust me, somebody will attempt to do if it looks remotely feasible!)
Good point!!
- Ted
|  |