lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen.
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Mike Galbraith wrote:

> > real world workloads. If your fairness hurts throughput that much maybe
> > your scheduler algorithm is just plain *wrong* as it isn't adapting to
> > workload at all well.
> Doesn't seem to be scheduler/fairness. 2.6.22.19 is O(1), and falls
> apart too, I posted the numbers and full dbench output yesterday.

We'll need to look into this a little bit more I think. I have sent out
some numbers too, and these indicate very clearly that there is more than
50% performance drop (measured by dbench) just after the very merge of CFS
in 2.6.23-rc1 merge window.

--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-10-27 14:45    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site