lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH -tip/cpus4096-v2] cpumask: fix cpumask of call_function_data

* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

>
> * Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
>
> > On Friday 24 October 2008 15:47:20 Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
> > > From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>
> >
> > Ingo, because of these concerns I recommend you revert
> > d4de5ac3b5e70928c86e3e5ac311f16cbf2e9ab3 (cpumask:
> > smp_call_function_many()) for now, and apply this less contentious
> > version.
>
> ok - applied it to tip/cpus4096-v2, thanks Rusty!
>
> If there's any chance for this in v2.6.28 then only if we disable
> the dynamic API branch altogether [CONFIG_MAXCPUS] and keep that for
> v2.6.29. This means we'd bring in the API changes which should have
> trivial impact only - and none of the riskier changes.

in any case, i've started testing tip/cpus4096-v2 again on x86 - the
problem with d4de5a above was the only outstanding known issue, right?

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-10-27 14:01    [W:0.080 / U:0.692 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site