lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] User namespaces: set of cleanups (v2)
Hi David,

On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 11:07:53 +0000 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> > It would be good if you could have a "next" (or "creds-next" or
> > something) branch in your tree and I can fetch that (that way I don't
> > have to keep updating my configs). It is OK if thet branch rebases and
> > may just be an alias for another branch (or a subset if you have
> > experimental stuff in there. Remember "posted, reviewed, tested before
> > it is in linux-next".
>
> Those patches aren't likely to change much, and they get hit with LTP
> regularly.

They already changed between what I thought was the correct branch and
what was the correct branch :-)

> What base for the patches? Linus's head?

Yes. Or whatever it is based on now if that merges OK with Linus' head
(try a test merge). Just don't base on linux-next :-)

What I want is exactly what you will ask/have asked Linus to fetch but
without the branch name changing .. I care more about the name changing
than the contents changing.

So .. what branch do I fetch tomorrow? (Hint: if you have your version
for Linus checked out then type "git branch next" and reply to this email
saying "next" :-))
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-10-26 12:57    [W:0.405 / U:0.084 seconds]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site