lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] User namespaces: set of cleanups (v2)
    Hi David,

    On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 11:07:53 +0000 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
    >
    > Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
    >
    > > It would be good if you could have a "next" (or "creds-next" or
    > > something) branch in your tree and I can fetch that (that way I don't
    > > have to keep updating my configs). It is OK if thet branch rebases and
    > > may just be an alias for another branch (or a subset if you have
    > > experimental stuff in there. Remember "posted, reviewed, tested before
    > > it is in linux-next".
    >
    > Those patches aren't likely to change much, and they get hit with LTP
    > regularly.

    They already changed between what I thought was the correct branch and
    what was the correct branch :-)

    > What base for the patches? Linus's head?

    Yes. Or whatever it is based on now if that merges OK with Linus' head
    (try a test merge). Just don't base on linux-next :-)

    What I want is exactly what you will ask/have asked Linus to fetch but
    without the branch name changing .. I care more about the name changing
    than the contents changing.

    So .. what branch do I fetch tomorrow? (Hint: if you have your version
    for Linus checked out then type "git branch next" and reply to this email
    saying "next" :-))
    --
    Cheers,
    Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
    http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-10-26 12:57    [W:0.022 / U:59.396 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site