lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: wierd new config options
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Why is UNEVICTABLE_LRU and option? Is there any rason to turn it off or
> is this just to confuse users?

Since the swapout code itself is already configurable with
CONFIG_SWAP, I do believe we want to be able to config out
the unevictable LRU code.

I guess it could be argued that maybe CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU
should just be folded into CONFIG_SWAP...

--
All Rights Reversed


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-10-23 22:03    [W:0.186 / U:0.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site