Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:59:42 -0400 | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: wierd new config options |
| |
Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Why is UNEVICTABLE_LRU and option? Is there any rason to turn it off or > is this just to confuse users?
Since the swapout code itself is already configurable with CONFIG_SWAP, I do believe we want to be able to config out the unevictable LRU code.
I guess it could be argued that maybe CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU should just be folded into CONFIG_SWAP...
-- All Rights Reversed
| |