lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: do_boot_cpu can deadlock?
[Gautham R Shenoy - Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:51:19PM +0530]
| On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 07:02:12PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
| > Hmm. arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c:do_boot_cpu() can deadlock ?
| >
| > It is called from _cpu_up() under cpu_hotplug_begin(), and it
| > waits for c_idle.work. Again, if we have the pending work which
| > needs get_online_cpus() we seem to have problems.
|
| Good point. Though this code gets triggered mostly during boot time when
| the CPUs are being brought online for the first time. If we have some
| work-item pending at that time, which needs get_online_cpus(), we could
| possibly see this deadlock.
|
| >
| > Oleg.
|
| --
| Thanks and Regards
| gautham
|

May I ask? If I understand right we do use this part of do_boot_cpu

if (!keventd_up() || current_is_keventd())
c_idle.work.func(&c_idle.work);
else {
schedule_work(&c_idle.work);
wait_for_completion(&c_idle.done);
}

if only we've been called the first time after power on. And all
subsequent call of this do_boot_cpu would lead to

if (c_idle.idle) {
c_idle.idle->thread.sp = (unsigned long) (((struct pt_regs *)
(THREAD_SIZE + task_stack_page(c_idle.idle))) - 1);
init_idle(c_idle.idle, cpu);
goto do_rest;
}

ie go to do_rest and no wait_for_completion/schedule_work at all.
Did I miss something? *Sorry* in advance if the question is quite
not related. This work-pending situation is in 'possible' scenario
only (ie we don't have such a callers for now... yet)?

- Cyrill -


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-10-23 20:51    [W:0.051 / U:0.492 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site