[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] SLUB - define OO_ macro instead of hardcoded numbers
    [Christoph Lameter - Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 09:28:14AM -0700]
    > On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
    >> Please check -- wouldn't it be better to use such a macro?
    > Looks good. But could you rename OO_MAX to something different? There is
    > already s->max which may cause confusion because s->max is the maximum
    > number of objects in a slab. OO_MAX is the maximum mask?

    I supposed it would mean maximum object number inside page (ie quantity) which
    is happen to be the same value as OO_MASK. Maybe OO_MAX_OBJ?

    - Cyrill -

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-10-22 18:39    [W:0.022 / U:39.668 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site