[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] Kernel version numbering scheme change
Alex Howells wrote:
> What I'd love to see any changes integrate would be a simple way to spot
> -stable releases in the version number (ie: 2.6.16, 2.6.27, those
> maintained for a "long" time and hopefully by quite 'bug
> free') versus the rest of releases sent out on a more regular basis.

Side note: Long-term maintained kernels like Adrian's 2.6.16.y or
distro kernels of this sort -> are not 'quite bug free' <-. They are
only -> quite regression free <-.

If you want bug fixes, you generally want new kernels. Only a fraction
of the bug fixes in new kernels are backported to the long-term
maintained stable kernels. OTOH, also only a fraction of the
regressions in new kernels is backported to them.
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- =-=- =-=-=

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-10-21 20:59    [W:0.086 / U:0.504 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site