[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] Kernel version numbering scheme change
    Alex Howells wrote:
    > What I'd love to see any changes integrate would be a simple way to spot
    > -stable releases in the version number (ie: 2.6.16, 2.6.27, those
    > maintained for a "long" time and hopefully by quite 'bug
    > free') versus the rest of releases sent out on a more regular basis.

    Side note: Long-term maintained kernels like Adrian's 2.6.16.y or
    distro kernels of this sort -> are not 'quite bug free' <-. They are
    only -> quite regression free <-.

    If you want bug fixes, you generally want new kernels. Only a fraction
    of the bug fixes in new kernels are backported to the long-term
    maintained stable kernels. OTOH, also only a fraction of the
    regressions in new kernels is backported to them.
    Stefan Richter
    -=====-==--- =-=- =-=-=

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-10-21 20:59    [W:0.040 / U:12.332 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site