Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:28:03 +0200 (CEST) | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] e1000e: prevent concurrent access to NVRAM |
| |
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote: > > The confirmed bugs where the nvram acquire code was called > > concurrently are still in your tree and the prevention patch along > > with the resulting bugfixes are stuck in some obscure intel QA > > process. > > > > Please apply at least the bug prevention patch below. > > This is the same patch I posted 7 minutes ago, except that this patch > without the e1000e changes applied before it will cause all sorts of > WARN's to be printed during normal operation. If at all possible I > think they should stay together as a group to prevent un-necessary > noise in the logs.
Sure, I'm all for the combo of those. I just wanted to get some motion into this stale process.
tglx
| |