lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] e1000e: prevent concurrent access to NVRAM
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> > The confirmed bugs where the nvram acquire code was called
> > concurrently are still in your tree and the prevention patch along
> > with the resulting bugfixes are stuck in some obscure intel QA
> > process.
> >
> > Please apply at least the bug prevention patch below.
>
> This is the same patch I posted 7 minutes ago, except that this patch
> without the e1000e changes applied before it will cause all sorts of
> WARN's to be printed during normal operation. If at all possible I
> think they should stay together as a group to prevent un-necessary
> noise in the logs.

Sure, I'm all for the combo of those. I just wanted to get some motion
into this stale process.

tglx



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-10-03 02:31    [W:0.102 / U:0.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site