lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] BUG: nr_phys_segments cannot be less than nr_hw_segments
FromJames Bottomley <>
DateThu, 02 Oct 2008 10:03:33 -0500
On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 19:59 +0530, Nikanth Karthikesan wrote:
> This is a follow-up to my earlier mail http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/23/294 
> ([PATCH] BUG: ll_merge_requests_fn() updates req->nr_phys_segments wrongly)
> 
> It is possible for the merging code to create lesser no of phys segments than 
> hw segments, but every hw segment needs atleast one new phys segment. This 
> triggers the BUG() on scsi_init_sgtable() as blk_rq_map_sg() returns more no 
> of segments than rq->nr_phys_segments
> 
> The following blktrace shows a sequence of bio's to trigger such condition on 
> my machine with max_sectors_kb=512 & max_hw_sectors_kb=32767.

Um, don't you mean this the other way around?  I can see this problem
occurring if the block layer gets tricked into doing a physical merge
where sector limits forbid a virtual merge.

The bug would appear to be that we sometimes only look at q->max_sectors
when deciding on mergability.  Either we have to insist on max_sectors
<= hw_max_sectors, or we have to start using min(q->max_sectors,
q->max_hw_sectors) for this.

James




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-10-02 17:07    [from the cache]
©2003-2008