Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:26:19 +0200 | | From | markus reichelt <> | | Subject | Re: [RFC] Kernel version numbering scheme change |
* Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> So, as someone who constantly is dealing with kernel version
> numbers all the time with the -stable trees, our current numbering
> scheme is a pain a times. How about this proposal instead?
Why not just keep it? It has worked so far, and from a strictly
end-user point of view I cannot see any advantages at all with a new
scheme. The ideas mentioned so far don't cut it either.
Just my heretic 2 cents,
S.
PS: Nice timing, thunderstorm approaching.
--
In Russia, President kills Financial Crisis
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] |  |