[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] Kernel version numbering scheme change
    On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 06:03:37PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
    > Greg KH wrote:
    >> Yes, we can handle the major/minor macros in the kernel to provide a
    >> compatible number so that automated scripts will not break, that's not a
    >> big deal.
    >> Any thoughts?
    >> Let the bike-shedding begin!
    > Personally I find that having a simple counter is kind of nice, simply
    > because one can talk about 27, 28, 29, ... and actually be able to rely on
    > it being stable.

    I would love to do that, start with 28.0 and go from there.

    It's just a number, might as well just treat it as such :)


    greg k-h

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-10-16 04:39    [W:0.020 / U:9.120 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site