[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    Subject[rfc] SLOB memory ordering issue
    I think I see a possible memory ordering problem with SLOB:
    In slab caches with constructors, the constructor is run
    before returning the object to caller, with no memory barrier

    Now there is nothing that indicates the _exact_ behaviour
    required here. Is it at all reasonable to expect ->ctor() to
    be visible to all CPUs and not just the allocating CPU?

    SLAB and SLUB don't appear to have this problem. Of course,
    they have per-CPU fastpath queues, so _can_ have effectively
    exactly the same ordering issue if the object was brought
    back into the "initialized" state before being freed, rather
    than by ->ctor(). However in that case, it is at least
    kind of visible to the caller.

    Anyone care or think it is a problem? Should we just document
    that ->ctor doesn't imply any barriers? Better ideas?

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-10-15 18:37    [W:4.139 / U:0.012 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site