lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Partition check considered as error is breaking mounting in 2.6.27
On Thu, Oct 09 2008, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 18:01 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 1:36 AM, Andrew Morton
> > <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:07:27 -0300
> > > Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton@mandriva.com.br> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Yes, here goes a new version:
> > >
> > > Well gee. Given a choice, I went and replied to the wrong thread.
> > > Here's what I think:
> > >
> > > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > >
> > > Herton Krzesinski reports that the error-checking changes in
> > > 04ebd4aee52b06a2c38127d9208546e5b96f3a19 ("block/ioctl.c and
> > > fs/partition/check.c: check value returned by add_partition") cause his
> > > buggy USB camera to no longer mount. "The camera is an Olympus X-840.
> > > The original issue comes from the camera itself: its format program
> > > creates a partition with an off by one error".
> > >
> > > Buggy devices happen. It is better for the kernel to warn and to proceed
> > > with the mount.
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton@mandriva.com.br>
> > > Cc: Abdel Benamrouche <draconux@gmail.com>
> > > Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > fs/partitions/check.c | 1 -
> > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff -puN fs/partitions/check.c~rescan_partitions-make-device-capacity-errors-non-fatal fs/partitions/check.c
> > > --- a/fs/partitions/check.c~rescan_partitions-make-device-capacity-errors-non-fatal
> > > +++ a/fs/partitions/check.c
> > > @@ -540,7 +540,6 @@ int rescan_partitions(struct gendisk *di
> > > if (from + size > get_capacity(disk)) {
> > > printk(KERN_ERR " %s: p%d exceeds device capacity\n",
> > > disk->disk_name, p);
> > > - continue;
> > > }
> > > res = add_partition(disk, p, from, size, state->parts[p].flags);
> > > if (res) {
> >
> > I was happy to see the original fix, as if causes real problems for
> > userspace, that the kernel creates invalid block devices with a size
> > that exceeds the physical disk. So, if we can not make that partition
> > to skip, like original patch did, because of broken hardware we don't
> > want to break, can we make it at least do the obvious thing, and limit
> > the partition with the broken entry to the size of the underlying
> > hardware. So that the kernel does no longer pretend to have devices of
> > a size which the hardware does not have.
> >
> > It breaks all sort of userspace tools which read the "size" file in
> > sysfs, or do BLKGETSIZE and we get, if we are lucky, only:
> > attempt to access beyond end of device
> > sda: rw=0, want=1953535936, limit=976773168
> > in other cases it might cause corruption, or lead mkfs to create
> > devices which will fail when they get used.
>
>
> From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
> Subject: block: sanitize invalid partition table entries
>
> We currently follow blindly what the partition table lies about the
> disk, and let the kernel create block devices which can not be accessed.
> Trying to identify the device leads to kernel logs full of:
> sdb: rw=0, want=73392, limit=28800
> attempt to access beyond end of device
>
> Here is an example of a broken partition table, where sda2 starts
> behind the end of the disk, and sdb3 is larger than the entire disk:
> Disk /dev/sdb: 14 MB, 14745600 bytes
> 1 heads, 29 sectors/track, 993 cylinders, total 28800 sectors
> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> /dev/sdb1 29 7800 3886 83 Linux
> /dev/sdb2 37801 45601 3900+ 83 Linux
> /dev/sdb3 15602 73402 28900+ 83 Linux
> /dev/sdb4 23403 28796 2697 83 Linux
>
> The kernel creates these completely invalid devices, which can not be
> accessed, or may lead to other unpredictable failures:
> grep . /sys/class/block/sdb*/{start,size}
> /sys/class/block/sdb/size:28800
> /sys/class/block/sdb1/start:29
> /sys/class/block/sdb1/size:7772
> /sys/class/block/sdb2/start:37801
> /sys/class/block/sdb2/size:7801
> /sys/class/block/sdb3/start:15602
> /sys/class/block/sdb3/size:57801
> /sys/class/block/sdb4/start:23403
> /sys/class/block/sdb4/size:5394
>
> With this patch, we ignore partitions which start behind the end of the disk,
> and limit partitions to the end of the disk if they pretend to be larger:
> grep . /sys/class/block/sdb*/{start,size}
> /sys/class/block/sdb/size:28800
> /sys/class/block/sdb1/start:29
> /sys/class/block/sdb1/size:7772
> /sys/class/block/sdb3/start:15602
> /sys/class/block/sdb3/size:13198
> /sys/class/block/sdb4/start:23403
> /sys/class/block/sdb4/size:5394
>
> These warnings are printed to the kernel log:
> sdb: p2 ignored, start 37801 is behind the end of the disk
> sdb: p3 size 57801 limited to end of disk
>
> Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
> ---
>
> check.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/fs/partitions/check.c b/fs/partitions/check.c
> index ecc3330..9545d8c 100644
> --- a/fs/partitions/check.c
> +++ b/fs/partitions/check.c
> @@ -498,10 +498,23 @@ int rescan_partitions(struct gendisk *disk, struct block_device *bdev)
> sector_t from = state->parts[p].from;
> if (!size)
> continue;
> + if (from >= get_capacity(disk)) {
> + printk(KERN_WARNING
> + "%s: p%d ignored, start %llu is behind the end of the disk\n",
> + disk->disk_name, p, (unsigned long long) from);
> + continue;
> + }
> if (from + size > get_capacity(disk)) {
> + /*
> + * we can not ignore partitions of broken tables
> + * created by for example camera firmware, but we
> + * limit them to the end of the disk to avoid
> + * creating invalid block devices
> + */
> printk(KERN_WARNING
> - "%s: p%d exceeds device capacity\n",
> - disk->disk_name, p);
> + "%s: p%d size %llu limited to end of disk\n",
> + disk->disk_name, p, (unsigned long long) size);
> + size = get_capacity(disk) - from;
> }
> res = add_partition(disk, p, from, size, state->parts[p].flags);
> if (res) {
>
>

Kay, I added this variant.

--
Jens Axboe



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-10-13 11:05    [W:0.066 / U:0.520 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site