lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Track in-kernel when we expect checkpoint/restart to work
Greg Kurz wrote:

> This flag is weak... testing it gives absolutly no hint whether the
> checkpoint may succeed or not. As it is designed now, a user can only be
> aware that checkpoint is *forever* denied. I agree that it's only useful
> as a "flexible CR todo list".

I don't think it's true that it gives "absolutly no hint".

If the flag is not set, then checkpoint will succeed, right? Whereas if
the flag is set, then it's an indication that checkpoint could fail (but
may still succeed if whatever condition caused the flag to be set is no
longer true).

Chris



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-10-10 19:21    [W:0.293 / U:0.148 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site