Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:54:22 +0200 | | From | Ingo Molnar <> | | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] first callers of process_deny_checkpoint() |
| |
* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > In the long run, could we expect a (experimental) version of > > hibernation that would just use this checkpointing facility to > > hibernate? > > Surely not ACPI-compliant.
what do you mean?
Ingo
|  |