lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jan]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [linux-kernel] Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override.
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 10:17:24AM -0800, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 16:27 +0100, Rene Herman wrote:
> > On 09-01-08 06:30, Christer Weinigel wrote:
> > I'd not expect very time crtical. The current outb_p use gives a delay
> > somewhere between .5 and 2 microseconds as per earlier survey meaning a
> > udelay(1) or 2 would be enough -- again, at the point that udelay() is sensible.
> >
> > New machines don't use the legacy PIC anymore anyway.
> >
> > > The floppy controller code uses outb_p. Even though there might be
> > > floppy controllers on modern systems, I'd rather leave the floppy code
> > > alone since it's supposed to be very fragile. If you still use
> > > floppies you deserve what you get.
> >
> > Floppies forever. In practice, leaving it alone isn't going to matter, but
> > in that same practice changing it to udelay() probably doesn't either. The
> > ones to leave alone are the ones that are clumsy/impossible to test and the
> > ones such as in NIC drivers that were specifically tuned.
>
> I'm speaking specifically in terms of 64-bit platforms here. Shouldn't
> we unconditionally drop outb_p doing extra port I/O on 64-bit
> architectures? Especially considering they don't even have an ISA bus
> where the decode timing could even matter?
>...

I don't think the latter statement was true - AFAIR there are Alphas
with ISA slots.

> Agree.
>
> Zach

cu
Adrian

--

"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-01-09 19:25    [W:0.091 / U:1.636 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site