![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 14:52:14 +0300 Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com> wrote: > Ok, but let's look at this a bit more opportunistic / optimistic. You can't play fast and loose with data integrity. Besides, if we looked at things optimistically, we would conclude that no fsck will be needed, ever :) > > http://infohost.nmt.edu/~val/review/chunkfs.pdf You will really want to read this paper, if you haven't already. -- All Rights Reversed | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-01-09 15:47 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||