Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Mon, 7 Jan 2008 21:45:17 -0800 | | From | Andrew Morton <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] eCryptfs: Fix dentry handling on create error, unlink, and inode destroy |
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 23:25:42 -0600 Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> --- a/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c
> @@ -120,22 +120,9 @@ ecryptfs_do_create(struct inode *directory_inode,
> rc = ecryptfs_create_underlying_file(lower_dir_dentry->d_inode,
> ecryptfs_dentry, mode, nd);
> if (rc) {
> - struct inode *ecryptfs_inode = ecryptfs_dentry->d_inode;
> - struct ecryptfs_inode_info *inode_info =
> - ecryptfs_inode_to_private(ecryptfs_inode);
> -
> - printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: Error creating underlying file; "
> - "rc = [%d]; checking for existing\n", __FUNCTION__, rc);
> - if (inode_info) {
> - mutex_lock(&inode_info->lower_file_mutex);
> - if (!inode_info->lower_file) {
> - mutex_unlock(&inode_info->lower_file_mutex);
> - printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Failure to set underlying "
> - "file; rc = [%d]\n", __FUNCTION__, rc);
> - goto out_lock;
> - }
> - mutex_unlock(&inode_info->lower_file_mutex);
> - }
> + printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Failure to create dentry in lower fs; "
> + "rc = [%d]\n", __FUNCTION__, rc);
> + goto out_lock;
> }
> rc = ecryptfs_interpose(lower_dentry, ecryptfs_dentry,
> directory_inode->i_sb, 0);
Will this cause an undesirable log storm if the underlying fs runs out of
space?
|  |