[lkml]   [2008]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [JANITOR PROPOSAL] Switch ioctl functions to ->unlocked_ioctl
    On Wednesday 09 January 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
    > I imagined it would check for
    > +struct file_operations ... = {
    > +      ...
    > +       .ioctl = ...
    > That wouldn't catch the case of someone adding only .ioctl to an
    > already existing file_operations which is not visible in the patch context,
    > but that should be hopefully rare. The more common case is adding
    > completely new operations

    Right, this would work fine. We can probably even have a list of
    data structures that work like file_operations in this regard.

    Arnd <><
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-01-09 02:23    [W:0.021 / U:38.236 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site