lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jan]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [2.6 patch] remove smbfs
    On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 22:16:13 +0100
    Guenter Kukkukk <linux@kukkukk.com> wrote:

    > Am Montag, 28. Januar 2008 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
    > > I remember that there were some small things missing in CIFS for
    > > completely replacing the unmaintained smbfs when we discussed
    > > removing smbfs back in 2005 due to smbfs being unmaintained.
    > >
    > > CIFS has improved since, smbfs is still unmaintained, and it's
    > > becoming time to finally remove smbfs.
    > >
    > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
    > >
    >
    > "... unmaintained smbfs ..." is not quite right, see
    > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/6/94
    > Before removing it now completely, drop
    > Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
    > a note.
    > Afaik, Redhat still has customers which rely on smbfs.
    >

    Some of our older products use smbfs, but our newer stuff (RHEL5 and
    up) have smbfs disabled. Fedora has had smbfs disabled for quite some
    time as well. I've heard very few complaints (though maybe they're just
    not getting to me).

    I have no problem with targeting smbfs for removal, but I thought
    Andrew had an unofficial policy that we should first mark things to be
    deprecated, and then remove them 2 releases later. That seems like a
    sensible policy to me. If we mark it deprecated in 2.6.25 then we can
    remove it after 2.6.26 is released.

    It might not even hurt to have a nice loud printk when the smbfs
    module is plugged in to warn users that it's slated to be removed,
    and that they should move to CIFS as soon as possible.

    > In addition, cifs cannot completely replace smbfs atm.
    > Even todays sold NAS-boxes (often running anchient
    > samba-2.x.x) work only with smbfs on the client side.

    It would be ideal if someone were to report these problems as bugs. I
    remember some of those in the past, but haven't heard of any cases of
    that sort of thing for some time. When I have, Steve has generally
    been very good about tracking down the cause and fixing it.

    Cheers,
    --
    Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-01-30 23:43    [W:0.021 / U:30.112 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site