Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 30 Jan 2008 12:26:00 -0600 | From | "Chris Friesen" <> | Subject | Re: ndiswrapper and GPL-only symbols redux |
| |
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> IANAL, but I have serious doubts whether putting some glue layer between > the GPL'ed code and the code with a not GPL compatible licence is really > a legally effictive way of circumventing the GPL.
It may depend on the details of the "code with a not GPL compatible licence".
It's pretty hard to argue that a binary driver written for another OS is a derivative work of the linux kernel.
Chris
| |