[lkml]   [2008]   [Jan]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: ndiswrapper and GPL-only symbols redux
Jon Masters wrote:

> I wouldn't quite say that. I wasn't going to comment, but...personally,
> I actually disagree with the assertions that ndiswrapper isn't causing
> proprietary code to link against GPL functions in the kernel (how is
> an NDIS implementation any different than a shim layer provided to
> load a graphics driver?), but I wasn't trying to make that point.

Well, as long as *any* part of the kernel ever links to proprietary
code, then GPL functions link to it in exactly the same way ndiswrapper
enables. It's only a matter of how many steps of separation.

A perfectly GPL USB network driver linked to GPL-only functions feeds
data into the kernel where it swirls about and emerges from a
proprietary network filesystem driver, for example.

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-01-30 06:43    [W:0.104 / U:1.380 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site