[lkml]   [2008]   [Jan]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] teach about list_for_each
    On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 11:10:58AM +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
    > We have had some stabs at changing this, but no consensus was reached on
    > whether it was a "for" or a "function". My memory is of there being
    > slightly more "without a space" tenders than the other and so it has not
    > been changed. This thread also seems so far to have not really
    > generated a concensus. So I would tend to leave things as they are.
    > A third option might be to accept either on *for_each* constructs.
    > That might tend to lead to divergance. Difficult. However, also see my
    > later comments on "style guide".

    Pretty much all core code uses list_for_each_entry( so new code should
    follow that example.

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-01-03 13:29    [W:2.122 / U:1.324 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site