Messages in this thread | | | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: [patch 02/20] make the inode i_mmap_lock a reader/writer lock | Date | Thu, 3 Jan 2008 17:07:14 +1100 |
| |
On Thursday 03 January 2008 10:35, Mike Travis wrote: > Hi Nick, > > Have you done anything more with allowing > 256 CPUS in this spinlock > patch? We've been testing with 1k cpus and to verify with -mm kernel, > we need to "unpatch" these spinlock changes. > > Thanks, > Mike
Hi Mike,
Actually I had it in my mind that 64 bit used single-byte locking like i386, so I didn't think I'd caused a regression there.
I'll take a look at fixing that up now.
Thanks, Nick
| |