Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:40:56 +0000 | From | Russell King <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] xtime_lock vs update_process_times |
| |
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 12:20:30PM +0000, Russell King wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:39:55AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > move update_process_times() out from under xtime_lock. > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> > > Peter, > > Mind if I merge: > > > arch/arm/common/time-acorn.c | 2 -- > > arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam926x_time.c | 3 --- > > arch/arm/plat-iop/time.c | 4 ---- > > arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/time.c | 2 -- > > with my patch and submit it as part of the ARM merge (which I'm hoping > to send in about an hours time.)
Don't bother - I'm sending my patch _now_ - I've run out of time to merge the above into this ARM tree pull (since I want to get Linus to pull it before yet more breakage happens to it - I've had to drop a number of branches with new conflicts as of last night to even get this far...)
-- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of:
| |