Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Borislav Petkov <> | Subject | [PATCH 20/32] ide-tape: make function name more accurate | Date | Sun, 27 Jan 2008 10:48:08 +0100 |
| |
From: Borislav Petkov <bbpetkov@yahoo.de>
idetape_active_next_stage() was rather ambiguous wrt its purpose. Make that more explicit and remove superfluous comment.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bbpetkov@yahoo.de> --- drivers/ide/ide-tape.c | 9 +++------ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c b/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c index fd7eeea..cf308d7 100644 --- a/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c @@ -820,10 +820,7 @@ static void idetape_analyze_error(ide_drive_t *drive, u8 *sense) } } -/* - * idetape_active_next_stage will declare the next stage as "active". - */ -static void idetape_active_next_stage (ide_drive_t *drive) +static void idetape_activate_next_stage(ide_drive_t *drive) { idetape_tape_t *tape = drive->driver_data; idetape_stage_t *stage = tape->next_stage; @@ -1004,7 +1001,7 @@ static int idetape_end_request(ide_drive_t *drive, int uptodate, int nr_sects) } } if (tape->next_stage != NULL) { - idetape_active_next_stage(drive); + idetape_activate_next_stage(drive); /* * Insert the next request into the request queue. @@ -2338,7 +2335,7 @@ static void idetape_insert_pipeline_into_queue (ide_drive_t *drive) return; if (!idetape_pipeline_active(tape)) { set_bit(IDETAPE_PIPELINE_ACTIVE, &tape->flags); - idetape_active_next_stage(drive); + idetape_activate_next_stage(drive); (void) ide_do_drive_cmd(drive, tape->active_data_request, ide_end); } } -- 1.5.3.7
| |