[lkml]   [2008]   [Jan]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
    Bart Van Assche wrote:
    > As you probably know there is a trend in enterprise computing towards
    > networked storage. This is illustrated by the emergence during the
    > past few years of standards like SRP (SCSI RDMA Protocol), iSCSI
    > (Internet SCSI) and iSER (iSCSI Extensions for RDMA). Two different
    > pieces of software are necessary to make networked storage possible:
    > initiator software and target software. As far as I know there exist
    > three different SCSI target implementations for Linux:
    > - The iSCSI Enterprise Target Daemon (IETD,
    > - The Linux SCSI Target Framework (STGT,;
    > - The Generic SCSI Target Middle Level for Linux project (SCST,
    > Since I was wondering which SCSI target software would be best suited
    > for an InfiniBand network, I started evaluating the STGT and SCST SCSI
    > target implementations. Apparently the performance difference between
    > STGT and SCST is small on 100 Mbit/s and 1 Gbit/s Ethernet networks,
    > but the SCST target software outperforms the STGT software on an
    > InfiniBand network. See also the following thread for the details:
    > About the design of the SCST software: while one of the goals of the
    > STGT project was to keep the in-kernel code minimal, the SCST project
    > implements the whole SCSI target in kernel space. SCST is implemented
    > as a set of new kernel modules, only minimal changes to the existing
    > kernel are necessary before the SCST kernel modules can be used. This
    > is the same approach that will be followed in the very near future in
    > the OpenSolaris kernel (see also
    > More information about
    > the design of SCST can be found here:
    > My impression is that both the STGT and SCST projects are well
    > designed, well maintained and have a considerable user base. According
    > to the SCST maintainer (Vladislav Bolkhovitin), SCST is superior to
    > STGT with respect to features, performance, maturity, stability, and
    > number of existing target drivers. Unfortunately the SCST kernel code
    > lives outside the kernel tree, which makes SCST harder to use than
    > STGT.
    > As an SCST user, I would like to see the SCST kernel code integrated
    > in the mainstream kernel because of its excellent performance on an
    > InfiniBand network. Since the SCST project comprises about 14 KLOC,
    > reviewing the SCST code will take considerable time. Who will do this
    > reviewing work ? And with regard to the comments made by the
    > reviewers: Vladislav, do you have the time to carry out the
    > modifications requested by the reviewers ? I expect a.o. that
    > reviewers will ask to move SCST's configuration pseudofiles from
    > procfs to sysfs.

    Sure, I do, although I personally don't see much sense in such move.

    > Bart Van Assche.
    > -
    > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
    > the body of a message to
    > More majordomo info at

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-01-23 18:41    [W:0.028 / U:13.956 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site