![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Jan 23, 2008 3:41 PM, Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> wrote: >> On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, David Miller wrote:>> > From: "Dave Young" <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com> > > Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:44:30 +0800 > > > > > On Jan 22, 2008 6:47 PM, Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> wrote: > > > > [PATCH] [TCP]: debug S+L > > > > > > Thanks, If there's new findings I will let you know. > > > > Thanks for helping with this bug Dave.>> I noticed btw that there thing might (is likely to) spuriously trigger at > WARN_ON(sacked != tp->sacked_out); because those won't be equal when SACK > is not enabled. If that does happen too often, I send a fixed patch for > it, yet, the fact that I print print tp->rx_opt.sack_ok allows > identification of those cases already as it's zero when SACK is not > enabled.>> Just ask if you need the updated debug patch. Thanks, please send, I would like to get it. >> --> i. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-01-23 07:47 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||